Case study
Integrate a laboratory while preserving useful applications.
Fictional scenario: an acquired laboratory uses a customized STARLIMS LIMS. This is an example of how an engagement could unfold.
Educational example, not a client reference. It does not describe a STARLIMS vulnerability or the results of a real engagement.
Initial discussion
Your team
Management wants to integrate an acquired laboratory while preserving operations.
Our work
We scope an assessment of the LIMS, its interfaces and its environment.
You receive: A scope agreed with IT and laboratory teams.
Current-state review
Your team
Teams demonstrate workflows and share authorized documentation.
Our work
We map usage, data flows and ownership in Re-App.
You receive: A shared view of the laboratory, ERP and equipment.
Risk assessment
Your team
Experts validate findings and identify undocumented areas.
Our work
We check support, dependencies and recovery arrangements.
You receive: A register separating verified findings from remaining unknowns.
Direction selection
Your team
Management weighs risks against operational constraints.
Our work
We compare secure retention, adaptation and replacement.
You receive: In this example: retain the LIMS, secure operations and document interfaces.
Change validation
Your team
Laboratory teams test proposed changes within an authorized scope.
Our work
A prototype can illustrate a workflow before implementation.
You receive: Acceptance criteria shared by business and IT.
Ongoing review
Your team
Owners update actions and changes in context.
Our work
We review milestones, residual risk and future investment.
You receive: A revisable roadmap rather than a fixed decision.
Let’s discuss your applications.
Request an assessmentA near-term deadline?
A support deadline or critical dependency may justify a focused priority assessment. Scope and available resources are confirmed before any delivery commitment.